Category talk:Igneous rocks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconRocks and minerals NA‑class
WikiProject iconCategory:Igneous rocks is part of WikiProject Rocks and minerals, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use rocks and minerals resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
NAThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.


  • I put lots of igneous rocks also under the category of volcanology, but since igneous rocks is also a subcategory of volcanology, maybe they shouldn't be there. Any thoughts? Gwimpey 23:43, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • There should be a subcategories of Igneous rocks into Felsic, Mafic, Intermediate, or even Potassic, Ultrapotassic rocks, alkaline, etc. Or is this too pedantic? I can see this could become a fight between placing certain rocks into either categories, or more than one, eg, kimberlite or lamproite could be both ultramafic and ultrapotassic, and probably should be both. Thoughts?Rolinator 03:35, 28 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Another thought (see discussion on list of rocks); We should aim to have only IUGS-sanctioned rock types on lists such as this. For instance, rhomb porphyry, unakite, napoleonite, Vaasa granite, are igneous rocks but are essentially plaace-names. This goes against the IUGS classification scheme.

Lapidiary stones (eg; Unakite) should be reclassified to elsewhere
Metasomatic rocks (Unakite; Uralite) should not be placed here
Textural varieties of other rocks should not be placed here, for example, "orbicular granite" is still just a granite; rhomb porphyry is a porphyritic volcnic rocks beter known by its official name.
Individual intrusions, volcanic formations, igneous complexes, etc should not be categorised as an Igneous Rock. Yes, they are igneous, but every individual intrusion cannot be placed in this category.

However, differentiating amongst the various broad classifications (granitoids, for instance) is fine; there is a mineralogical and genetic difference between a granite and a tonalite. Rolinator 02:21, 19 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

=Categorization proposal[edit]

Seeing that the category igneous rocks is very mixed, large and not well suited to do fast search I have crated the following subcategories:

  • Igneous rocks by composition
  • Calc-alkaline rocks
  • Felsic rocks
  • Intermediate rocks
  • Mafic rocks
  • Ultramfic rocks
  • Ultrapotassic rocks
  • Igneous rocks by texture
  • Aphanitic rocks
  • Vitreous rocks
  • Phaneritic rocks
  • Granitic rocks
  • Ophitic rocks
  • Porphyritic rocks

Dentren | Talk 13:12, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]